The Longer the Better? the Effect of Service Duration on Service Judgments

Consumers tend to evaluate services based on the duration of the services. In a series of experiments, we show that (a) judgments that are based on duration deviate from more optimal judgments that are based on the actual content of the service, and (b) the impact of duration on judgment is more apparent when duration is considered in relation to the price of the service than when it is evaluated alone. We also document a situation in which the use of duration backfires and leads to judgments that not just deviate from, but are opposite of an optimal judgment. Finally, a field study provided external validity for the duration heuristic by demonstrating its impact in a real-world consumer setting.



Citation:

Catherine Yeung and Dilip Soman (2006) ,"The Longer the Better? the Effect of Service Duration on Service Judgments", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 7, eds. Margaret Craig Lees, Teresa Davis, and Gary Gregory, Sydney, Australia : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: .

Authors

Catherine Yeung, Assistant Professor, National University of Singapore
Dilip Soman, Professor, University of Toronto



Volume

AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 7 | 2006



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

P10. Omission Bias in the Gain vs. Loss Domain

Jen H. Park, Stanford University, USA

Read More

Featured

Q3. Academic Branding on Social Media: Examining the Influence of Personal Brands on the Professor-Student Relationships

Edita Petrylaite, Northumbria University, UK
Darija Aleksic, University of Ljubljana

Read More

Featured

Brand Relationships in a "Post-Fact” World

Luciana Velloso, York University, Canada
Eileen Fischer, York University, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.