Nutrition Claims, Anticipated Guilt, and Consumption Quantity

We develop and test a framework that contends that “low fat” nutrition labels increase food intake by 1) increasing perceptions of the appropriate serving size, and 2) decreasing anticipated consumption guilt. Three studies show that “low fat” labels lead all consumers—particularly those who are overweight—to overeat hedonic and utilitarian snack foods. Furthermore, salient objective serving size information (e.g., “servings per container: 2”) only reduces overeating among guilt-prone normal weight consumers, not among overweight consumers. This helps explain why the influence of relative nutrition claims differ according to the factors associated with guilt, such as whether an individual has a normal weight or whether the food is hedonic.



Citation:

Brian Wansink and Pierre Chandon (2007) ,"Nutrition Claims, Anticipated Guilt, and Consumption Quantity", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 84-85.

Authors

Brian Wansink, Cornell University, USA
Pierre Chandon, INSEAD, France



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Doing Worse but Feeling Better: Consequences of Collective Choice

Nuno Jose Lopes, University of Navarra
Elena Reutskaja, IESE Business School

Read More

Featured

The Effects of Glossy Versus Matte Imagery on Consumers’ Decision Making

Yoonho Jin, INSEAD, Singapore
Amitava Chattopadhyay, INSEAD, Singapore

Read More

Featured

The Effect of Psychological Control on Temporal Discounting: Conceptual and Methodological Implications

Kelly Kiyeon Lee, Georgetown University, USA
Selin A. Malkoc, Ohio State University, USA
Derek Rucker, Northwestern University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.