Why Improved Nutritional Labels May Not Help Combat Obesity

We argue that the effectiveness of more accessible and easier-to-digest nutrition labels depends on (1) consumers’ attitudes and ambivalence toward less healthy foods, (2) the way consumers process information from newer, more vivid labels, and (3) the types of messages consumers are exposed to along with the labels. In three studies, we find that improved labels either have no effects on non-ambivalent consumers or lead them to “economize” on their search for information and not check the more informative nutrition facts labels. However, ambivalent consumers are more eager for information to resolve their ambivalence and therefore respond to improved nutritional labels with healthier choices.



Citation:

Paul Bloom and Lisa Bolton (2007) ,"Why Improved Nutritional Labels May Not Help Combat Obesity", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 647-700.

Authors

Paul Bloom, Duke University, USA
Lisa Bolton, Wharton, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Beyond Needs and Wants: How Networked Hyper-rational Economic Actors “Win” the Deal but “Lose” the Shopping Trip

Colin Campbell, University of San Diego, USA
Hope Schau, University of Arizona, USA

Read More

Featured

How Employees Relate to Their Brand Online: A Critical Visual Analysis of Hollister

Stephanie Kogler, University of Innsbruck, Austria

Read More

Featured

R2. Brand-to-Brand Communications: How Consumers React to Flattery Between Brands

Lingrui Zhou, Duke University, USA
Katherine Crain, Duke University, USA
Keisha Cutright, Duke University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.