Why Improved Nutritional Labels May Not Help Combat Obesity

We argue that the effectiveness of more accessible and easier-to-digest nutrition labels depends on (1) consumers’ attitudes and ambivalence toward less healthy foods, (2) the way consumers process information from newer, more vivid labels, and (3) the types of messages consumers are exposed to along with the labels. In three studies, we find that improved labels either have no effects on non-ambivalent consumers or lead them to “economize” on their search for information and not check the more informative nutrition facts labels. However, ambivalent consumers are more eager for information to resolve their ambivalence and therefore respond to improved nutritional labels with healthier choices.



Citation:

Paul Bloom and Lisa Bolton (2007) ,"Why Improved Nutritional Labels May Not Help Combat Obesity", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 647-700.

Authors

Paul Bloom, Duke University, USA
Lisa Bolton, Wharton, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Ecce Machina Humana: Examining Competence and Warmth in Consumer Robots The two fundamental social judgment dimensions-competence and warmth-are as relevant for judging consumer robots as for humans. We find that competence has an increasing positive eff

Read More

Featured

E13. Rooting for Rocky or Apollo? Underdog Narratives and Crowdfunding Success

Hua (Meg) Meng, Longwood University, USA
César Zamudio, Kent State University, USA
Yiru Wang, Kent State University, USA

Read More

Featured

P12. Disclosure of Project Risk in Crowdfunding

Jooyoung Park, Peking University
KEONGTAE KIM, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.