Why Improved Nutritional Labels May Not Help Combat Obesity
We argue that the effectiveness of more accessible and easier-to-digest nutrition labels depends on (1) consumers’ attitudes and ambivalence toward less healthy foods, (2) the way consumers process information from newer, more vivid labels, and (3) the types of messages consumers are exposed to along with the labels. In three studies, we find that improved labels either have no effects on non-ambivalent consumers or lead them to “economize” on their search for information and not check the more informative nutrition facts labels. However, ambivalent consumers are more eager for information to resolve their ambivalence and therefore respond to improved nutritional labels with healthier choices.
Paul Bloom and Lisa Bolton (2007) ,"Why Improved Nutritional Labels May Not Help Combat Obesity", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 647-700.
Paul Bloom, Duke University, USA
Lisa Bolton, Wharton, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007
Both Good from Afar…and Far from Good? Mental Representation Changes Consumer Preference for Products from a Brand with a Reputation for Innovativeness
Jeff Larson, Brigham Young University, USA
Kelly Goldsmith, Vanderbilt University, USA
BJ Allen, University of Arkansas, USA
Q3. Academic Branding on Social Media: Examining the Influence of Personal Brands on the Professor-Student Relationships
Edita Petrylaite, Northumbria University, UK
Darija Aleksic, University of Ljubljana
Collaborative Work as Catalyst for Market Formation: The Case of the Ancestral Health Market
Burcak Ertimur, Fairleigh Dickinson University
Steven Chen, California State University, Fullerton