Negativity Bias in the Perception of External Agency

People seem apt to believe that machines have a “mind of their own” when they malfunction and that referees were responsible for their team’s loss. Yet, when machines work well or their team is winning, the state of affairs is seldom attributed to the intentions of an external agent. This discrepancy reflects a general asymmetry in the way people ascribe intentional agency. Four experiments, employing ultimatum games and gambles, demonstrate that negative outcomes more often prompt one to infer the presence and influence of external intentional agents than do neutral and positive outcomes.



Citation:

Carey Morewedge (2007) ,"Negativity Bias in the Perception of External Agency", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 534-537.

Authors

Carey Morewedge, Princeton University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

A7. Credible Critters: Source and Message Expectancy Violation and Influence on Perceived Trustworthiness and Credibility

Justin Graeber, University of Texas at Austin, USA

Read More

Featured

Faster than Fact: Consuming in Post-Truth Society

Robert Kozinets, University of Southern California, USA
Rossella Gambetti, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Silvia Biraghi, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Read More

Featured

Augmented Reality, Augmented Trust: How Augmented Reality Enhances Consumer Trust In Online Shopping

Alberto Lopez, Tecnológico de Monterrey, MEXICO
Rachel Rodriguez, Tecnológico de Monterrey, MEXICO
Claudia Quintanilla, Tecnológico de Monterrey, MEXICO
Raquel Castaño, Tecnológico de Monterrey, MEXICO

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.