Aesthetic Advertisements and Scientific Evaluations: Divergent Philosophies in Advertising Production
This paper explores the historical division between art and science in advertising, and draws from interpretive data collected in an Irish advertising agency. A discourse analysis of ethnographic interviews conducted with advertising planners, copywriters and art directors reveals that implicit models of advertising evaluation based in the traditional scientific paradigm of prediction, measurement and control are employed by large corporate clients to evaluate and rationalise advertisements through research, and this is identified as a source of creative conflict and philosophical division. Some suggestions for a cultural and aesthetic approach to research knowledge are offered as a viable alternative to the scientific paradigm in advertising production.
Aidan Kelly, Katrina Lawlor, and Stephanie O'Donohoe (2007) ,"Aesthetic Advertisements and Scientific Evaluations: Divergent Philosophies in Advertising Production", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 81-82.
Aidan Kelly, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland.
Katrina Lawlor, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland.
Stephanie O'Donohoe, University of Edinburgh, UK.
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007
A3. Why People Still Do Not Trust Algorithmic Advice in Decision Making
JAEWON HWANG, Sejong University
Dong Il Lee, Sejong University
P11. A Price Premium on A Trivial but Weak Preferred Attribute Increase Choice: The Roles of Scarcity, Arousal and Perceived Risk
Yueyan Wu, Hunan University, China
Chunyan Xie, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
Zhi Yang, Hunan University, China
Luluo Peng, Hunan University, China
Can “Related Articles” Correct Misperceptions from False Information on Social Media?
Yu Ding, Columbia University, USA
Mira Mayrhofer, University of Vienna
Gita Venkataramani Johar, Columbia University, USA