Do We Really Need a Reason to Indulge?

Decisions to indulge oneself (e.g., purchasing luxuries, going on a cruise) may require legitimate reasons because hedonic indulgences may be construed as wasteful and are likely to evoke guilt. Our study shows that participants expect to experience more negative affect (e.g., guilt) if consuming a hedonic item without a reason than with a reason when asked in a global report fashion (e.g., “How would you feel consuming this item?”). Other participants were asked to report on how they felt during the last consumption episode. Their hedonic enjoyment was unrelated to reasons and justifications. This suggests that a lack of justification does not limit the immediate pleasure of indulging, in contrast to what consumers expect.


Jing Xu and Norbert Schwarz (2007) ,"Do We Really Need a Reason to Indulge?", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 456-458.


Jing Xu, University of Michigan, USA
Norbert Schwarz, University of Michigan, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Unintended Customer Consequences of Corporate Lobbying

Gautham Vadakkepatt, George Mason University
Kelly Martin, Colorado State University
Neeru Paharia, Georgetown University, USA
Sandeep Arora, University of Manitoba, Canada

Read More


Paying to Purchase a Conversation Topic

Hillary Wiener, University at Albany
Joshua Wiener, Oklahoma State University, USA

Read More


When the Face of Need Backfires: The Impact of Facial Emotional Expression on the Effectiveness of Cause-Related Advertisements

In-Hye Kang, University of Maryland, USA
Marijke Leliveld, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Rosellina Ferraro, University of Maryland, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.