When a Good Impression Goes Bad:The Effect of Goal Changes on Repeated Attitudes Enquires
Drawing on Selective Accessibility Model (Mussweiler 2003), we argue when consumers evaluate an object repeatedly but with conflicting consumption goals, their earlier positive (bad) attitude formed under one consumption goal can be used as a comparison standard, making the later evaluations under the other goals worse (better) off. Using a within-subject experiment design, in experiment 1, we showed the contrast effect between two reported attitudes formed under conflicting consumption goals; in experiment 2, we demonstrated that the contrast effect was more robust when individuals reported their later evaluations under high cognitive load.
Xiuping Li (2007) ,"When a Good Impression Goes Bad:The Effect of Goal Changes on Repeated Attitudes Enquires", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 452-454.
Xiuping Li, University of Toronto, Canada
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007
Powerful Buy Time: Why Social Power Leads to Prioritizing Time over Money
Myungjin Chung, University of Texas at Arlington
Ritesh Saini, University of Texas at Arlington
Unobserved Altruism: How Social- And Self-Signaling Motivations Shape Willingness to Donate
Jennifer Savary, University of Arizona, USA
Kelly Goldsmith, Vanderbilt University, USA
K8. Framing Matters. How Comparisons to Ideal and Anti-Ideal Reference Points Affect Brand Evaluations.
Magdalena Zyta Jablonska, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Andrzej Falkowski, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities