Are “Paradigms Lost” in Marketing? Some Twenty Years Later…: a Content Analysis
It has been more than twenty years since Deshpande (1983) wrote his “Paradigms Lost” article. My objective in this paper is an attempt to provide a more statistical account of the article’s claim that quantitative research dominates the marketing literature, but after some twenty years later. A content analysis of the three leading journals in marketing (JM, JMR and JCR) was done for three years (2002 to 2004). The findings do provide “snapshot” evidence of the dominance of the quantitative paradigm. However, though purely qualitative studies are still minimal, their integration with quantitative studies maybe catching pace.
Saleh AlShebil (2007) ,"Are “Paradigms Lost” in Marketing? Some Twenty Years Later…: a Content Analysis", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 434-445.
Saleh AlShebil, University of Texas at Arlington, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007
Making Sense of Spontaneity: In-The-Moment Decisions Promote More Meaningful Experiences
Jacqueline R. Rifkin, Duke University, USA
Keisha Cutright, Duke University, USA
Q5. Conceptualizing the Digital Experience in Luxury
Wided Batat, American University Beirut
When Implementation Intentions Backfire: Illusion of Goal Progress in Financial Decisions
Linda Court Salisbury, Boston College, USA
Gergana Y. Nenkov, Boston College, USA
Min Zhao, Boston College, USA