Are “Paradigms Lost” in Marketing? Some Twenty Years Later…: a Content Analysis
It has been more than twenty years since Deshpande (1983) wrote his “Paradigms Lost” article. My objective in this paper is an attempt to provide a more statistical account of the article’s claim that quantitative research dominates the marketing literature, but after some twenty years later. A content analysis of the three leading journals in marketing (JM, JMR and JCR) was done for three years (2002 to 2004). The findings do provide “snapshot” evidence of the dominance of the quantitative paradigm. However, though purely qualitative studies are still minimal, their integration with quantitative studies maybe catching pace.
Saleh AlShebil (2007) ,"Are “Paradigms Lost” in Marketing? Some Twenty Years Later…: a Content Analysis", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 434-445.
Saleh AlShebil, University of Texas at Arlington, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007
The “Break-in” Effect: A Token Gesture Can Increase Task Initiation and Prevent Goal Abandonment
Adelle Xue Yang, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Babu Gounder, University of Miami, USA
Rajesh Bagchi, Virginia Tech, USA
Believing in and Reacting to Rumors: The Role of Congruity and Nature of Existing Predisposition
Satadruta Mookherjee, SUNY Binghamton, USA
Subimal Chatterjee, SUNY Binghamton, USA
The Mystique of Masculine and Feminine Choices: How Aversive Feelings Underlie Preferences
Niusha Jones, University of North Texas
Blair Kidwell, University of North Texas