“Faster Is Not Always Better: Regulatory Focus and the Interpretation of Download Time”

In three studies, we show that a short (0-1 s.) download time leads to decreased online persuasion compared to a moderate one (5-10 s.) when consumers are in a prevention focus. Two explanations are: (1) a conservative bias makes these consumers mindlessly apply conversational norms, and (2) a moderate download time provides a better regulatory fit. Consumers in a promotion focus do not exhibit a conservative bias, and a short download time gives them more value from fit. Hence, short (moderate) is better for promotion (prevention)-focused consumers. We examine whether one or both of these explanations account for the data.



Citation:

Anne Laure Sellier and Amitava Chattopadhyay (2007) ,"“Faster Is Not Always Better: Regulatory Focus and the Interpretation of Download Time”", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 211-215.

Authors

Anne Laure Sellier, New York University, USA
Amitava Chattopadhyay, INSEAD, Singapore



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Meat the Needs: Ahold Delhaize Sustainable Retailing Model

Darrell Eugene Bartholomew, Pennsylvania State University, USA
Maggie M Mehalko, Pennsylvania State University, USA

Read More

Featured

K6. Persuading the Moral Consumer: Matching Messages to Attitude Basis

Aviva Philipp-Muller, Ohio State University, USA
Andrew Luttrell, Ball State University
Richard Petty, Ohio State University, USA

Read More

Featured

B7. Conceptualizing Brand Arrogance and Its Impact on Consumer Trust

Sampoorna Nandi, University of Connecticut, USA
Robin A. Coulter, University of Connecticut, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.