Critique of the Measurement of Happiness

Measuring happiness has become not only a topic of interest for psychologists, but a popular tool in public policy. After all, if policy is about maximizing happiness, what could be better than asking people about it directly? In this work we add some cautionary notes to this issue, suggesting that the interpretation of such happiness ratings might be premature, and sometimes misleading. To illustrate our point we conducted two types of studies: one addressing the question of using happiness scales, and the other addressing the construct of happiness more generally.



Citation:

Dan Ariely, Uri Gneezy, and Moshe Hoffman (2007) ,"Critique of the Measurement of Happiness", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 355-358.

Authors

Dan Ariely, MIT, USA
Uri Gneezy, University of San Diego, USA
Moshe Hoffman, University of Chicago, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Psychological Reactions to Human Versus Robotic Job Replacement

Armin Granulo, Technical University of Munich
Christopher Fuchs, Technical University of Munich
Stefano Puntoni, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Read More

Featured

The Unbearable Smallness of Being: How Feeling Physical Small Influences Decision Delegation

Eunyoung Camilla Song, University of Florida, USA
Yanping Tu, University of Florida, USA
Rima Touré-Tillery, Northwestern University, USA

Read More

Featured

The Power of the Past: Consumer Nostalgia as a Coping Resource

Dovile Barauskaite, ISM University of Management and Economics
Justina Gineikiene, ISM University of Management and Economics
Bob Fennis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.