Progressing a Taxonomy of Possible Reflexivities: Guidelines For Reflexive Practice in Consumer Research
Reflexivity has been identified in consumer research (Wallendorf and Brucks, 1993, Hirschman 1993, Thompson 2002) and in the wider social sciences (e.g. Wasserfall, 1993, Mauthner and Doucet, 1998, 2003) as a useful way to address power and control in the research encounter, to attend to the researcher/researched dynamic and to give insightful commentaries into the research process itself. The purpose of this paper is to develop a more structured approach to what reflexivity is and how it might be achieved. More specifically this paper progresses the authors’ recent work on researcher reflexivity which produced a formal taxonomy of the different reflexivities which might be enacted within consumer research (Bettany and Woodruffe-Burton 2005). This taxonomy has been developed further in this work and augmented with practical guidelines for the different approaches to reflexivity to guide the reflexive consumer researcher.
Shona Bettany and Helen Woodruffe-Burton (2007) ,"Progressing a Taxonomy of Possible Reflexivities: Guidelines For Reflexive Practice in Consumer Research", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 703.
Shona Bettany, University of Bradford, UK
Helen Woodruffe-Burton, University of Lancaster and University College of St.Martins UK
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007
How Do Platform-Based Networks Shape Systemic Value Creation Through Experiences?
Bernardo Figueiredo, RMIT University
daiane scaraboto, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Metaphorically Transgressing the Brand Relationship
Alberto Lopez, Tecnológico de Monterrey, MEXICO
Martin Reimann, University of Arizona, USA
Raquel Castaño, Tecnológico de Monterrey, MEXICO
Losing Fast or Slow? Preferences for Uncertainty Resolution
Kurt P. Munz, New York University, USA
Alixandra Barasch, New York University, USA