How Long Did That Take? the Role of Causal Attribution in Estimating Elapsed Time

Recent research has shown that people judge the time between causally related events to be shorter than that between causally unrelated events. We test the hypothesis that this effect of causality reflects a default physics-based view of causality. Consistent with this hypothesis, we find that the time-shortening tendency persists for causes that have a dissipating force over time, but is muted for causes that exert a stable or increasing force over time. Further, we find that low NFC participants, whom we hypothesize are more likely to rely on the default physics-based view, give shorter time estimates than high NFC participants.



Citation:

David Faro, Ann McGill, and Reid Hastie (2007) ,"How Long Did That Take? the Role of Causal Attribution in Estimating Elapsed Time", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 407-411.

Authors

David Faro, London Business School, UK
Ann McGill, University of Chicago, USA
Reid Hastie, University of Chicago, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

M5. The More Expensive a Gift Is, the More It Is Appreciated? The Effect of Gift Price on Recipients’ Appreciation

Jooyoung Park, Peking University
MENGSHU CHEN, Tencent Holdings Limited

Read More

Featured

Deprivation of Control and the Phonetic Appeal of Brand Names

Jamel Khenfer, Zayed University
Caroline Cuny, Grenoble Ecole de Management

Read More

Featured

Penny for Your Preferences: Leveraging Self-Expression to Increase Prosocial Giving

Jacqueline R. Rifkin, Duke University, USA
Katherine Crain, Duke University, USA
Jonah Berger, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.