Consumer Consideration Sets: Altering Memory, Brand Evaluations, and Choice

Nedungadi (1990) suggested that only minor brands within a product category will benefit from advertising effects of competitors. We speculate that his results may have been restricted because he used a limited set of brand categories, and his hypotheses were derived from assumptions of the separate systems account of memory (Kronlund, Whittlesea and Yoon, forthcoming). Importantly, his results are not consistent with the DRM effect (Roediger & McDermott, 1995), which suggests the most benefit would accrue to major rather than minor brands. We performed a re-inquiry into the work of Nedungadi (1990).


Antonia Kronlund and Carolyn Yoon (2007) ,"Consumer Consideration Sets: Altering Memory, Brand Evaluations, and Choice", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 407-410.


Antonia Kronlund, Department of Marketing, International Business and Strategy, Brock University, Canada
Carolyn Yoon, Department of Marketing, University of Michigan


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


If No One Saw It on Instagram, Was It Any Good? Examining Received Attention as a Social Benefit of Experiential Consumption

Matthew J Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Jamie D. Hyodo, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Read More


Making Sense of Spontaneity: In-The-Moment Decisions Promote More Meaningful Experiences

Jacqueline R. Rifkin, Duke University, USA
Keisha Cutright, Duke University, USA

Read More


P12. Disclosure of Project Risk in Crowdfunding

Jooyoung Park, Peking University
KEONGTAE KIM, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.