Cue Competition, Attention Shifting, and the Highlighting Effect
Consumers often learn about product attributes all competitors have in common and product attributes unique to each competitor. According to Attentional Theory, the associative strength between attributes and their brands is determined by the order of learning. Attentional Theory predicts that common attributes will be more strongly associated with earlier-learned brands, while unique attributes will be more strongly associated with later-learned brands. Thus, consumers will prefer an earlier-learned brand when common attributes offer a higher value than unique attributes do, but a later-learned brand when unique attributes offer a higher value than common attributes. We test these implications in three experiments.
Marcus Cunha and Juliano Laran (2007) ,"Cue Competition, Attention Shifting, and the Highlighting Effect", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 551-552.
Marcus Cunha, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
Juliano Laran, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007
The Asymmetric Effect of Highlighting Intertemporal Opportunity Costs
Christopher Olivola, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
David Hardisty, University of British Columbia, Canada
Daniel Read, University of Warwick
Conflicting Institutional Logics and Eldercare Consumers’ Coping Strategies in Asymmetrical Service Relationships
Ankita Kumar, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Economic Tremors and Earthquakes: Sharing, The Sharing Economy, Crowdfunding, Cryptocurrencies, and DAOs
Russell W. Belk, York University, Canada