The Process By Which Brand Committed Consumers Evaluate Competitive Brands: the Case For Similarity and Dissimilarity Testing
We examine the evaluation of competitive brands by high and low commitment consumers. We propose that both high and low commitment consumers use a selective hypothesis testing mechanism. However, we predict that high commitment consumers use a dissimilarity testing process, while low commitment consumers use a similarity testing process, resulting in different outcomes for the evaluation of competitor brands. Three studies are reported that examine these predictions.
Sekar Raju and H. Rao Unnava (2007) ,"The Process By Which Brand Committed Consumers Evaluate Competitive Brands: the Case For Similarity and Dissimilarity Testing", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 662-663.
Sekar Raju, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
H. Rao Unnava, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007
Exploring the Intersection of Digital Virtual Consumption and Family Rituals
Linda Tuncay Zayer, Loyola University Chicago, USA
Jenna Drenten, Loyola University Chicago, USA
Both Good from Afar…and Far from Good? Mental Representation Changes Consumer Preference for Products from a Brand with a Reputation for Innovativeness
Jeff Larson, Brigham Young University, USA
Kelly Goldsmith, Vanderbilt University, USA
BJ Allen, University of Arkansas, USA
Powerful Buy Time: Why Social Power Leads to Prioritizing Time over Money
Myungjin Chung, University of Texas at Arlington
Ritesh Saini, University of Texas at Arlington