The Process By Which Brand Committed Consumers Evaluate Competitive Brands: the Case For Similarity and Dissimilarity Testing

We examine the evaluation of competitive brands by high and low commitment consumers. We propose that both high and low commitment consumers use a selective hypothesis testing mechanism. However, we predict that high commitment consumers use a dissimilarity testing process, while low commitment consumers use a similarity testing process, resulting in different outcomes for the evaluation of competitor brands. Three studies are reported that examine these predictions.



Citation:

Sekar Raju and H. Rao Unnava (2007) ,"The Process By Which Brand Committed Consumers Evaluate Competitive Brands: the Case For Similarity and Dissimilarity Testing", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34, eds. Gavan Fitzsimons and Vicki Morwitz, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 662-663.

Authors

Sekar Raju, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
H. Rao Unnava, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 34 | 2007



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

How the Past Shapes the Present: The Assimilation of Enjoyment to Similar Past Experiences

Anika Stuppy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Bram Van den Bergh, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Read More

Featured

Brand’s Moral Character Predominates in Brand Perception and Evaluation

Mansur Khamitov, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Rod Duclos, Western University, Canada

Read More

Featured

The Trusted Influencer: How They Do It and How Brands Can Benefit

Gillian Brooks, Oxford University, UK
Mikolaj Piskorski, IMD

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.