It Seems Factual, But Is It? Effects of Using Sharp Versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims
It Seems Factual, But Is It?
Effects of Using Sharp versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims
Robert M. Schindler, Rutgers University-Camden
Richard F. Yalch, University of Washington-Seattle
This paper compares sharp versus round numbers in advertising claims. Round numbers have a salient conceptual basis (e.g., 10 years are a decade). Sharp numbers do not (e.g., 7 years). Estimates tend to be expressed with round numbers. An experiment is described that examines whether consumers make the false assumption that claims using sharp numbers are less likely to be estimates (i.e., are more factual) than those using round numbers and, if so, whether this makes sharp-number claims more believable. The results demonstrate that such assumptions do occur, particularly for those consumers considered to be advertising skeptics.
Robert Schindler and Richard Yalch (2006) ,"It Seems Factual, But Is It? Effects of Using Sharp Versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 33, eds. Connie Pechmann and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 586-590.
Robert Schindler, Rutgers University, Camden
Richard Yalch, University of Washington, Seattle
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 33 | 2006
Featured papersSee More
Q3. Academic Branding on Social Media: Examining the Influence of Personal Brands on the Professor-Student Relationships
Edita Petrylaite, Northumbria University, UK
Darija Aleksic, University of Ljubljana
A Taxonomy of Opposition to Genetically Modified Foods
Philip M. Fernbach, University of Colorado, USA
Nicholas Light, University of Colorado, USA
Lauren Min, University of Colorado, USA
Prices in Red: When a Red Price Becomes a Stop Sign
Hongjun Ye, Drexel University, USA
Siddharth Bhatt, Drexel University, USA
Rajneesh Suri, Drexel University, USA