It Seems Factual, But Is It? Effects of Using Sharp Versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims
It Seems Factual, But Is It?
Effects of Using Sharp versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims
Robert M. Schindler, Rutgers University-Camden
Richard F. Yalch, University of Washington-Seattle
This paper compares sharp versus round numbers in advertising claims. Round numbers have a salient conceptual basis (e.g., 10 years are a decade). Sharp numbers do not (e.g., 7 years). Estimates tend to be expressed with round numbers. An experiment is described that examines whether consumers make the false assumption that claims using sharp numbers are less likely to be estimates (i.e., are more factual) than those using round numbers and, if so, whether this makes sharp-number claims more believable. The results demonstrate that such assumptions do occur, particularly for those consumers considered to be advertising skeptics.
Robert Schindler and Richard Yalch (2006) ,"It Seems Factual, But Is It? Effects of Using Sharp Versus Round Numbers in Advertising Claims", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 33, eds. Connie Pechmann and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 586-590.
Robert Schindler, Rutgers University, Camden
Richard Yalch, University of Washington, Seattle
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 33 | 2006
Morality Matters in the Marketplace: The Influence of Morally Based Attitudes on Consumer Purchase Intentions
Andrew Luttrell, Ball State University
Jacob Teeny, Ohio State University, USA
Richard Petty, Ohio State University, USA
Neural pattern similarity reveals brand equity
Feng Sheng, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Michael Platt, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Changes in Social Values in the United States – 1976-2017: Is a New Age of Tribalism Emerging?
Eda Gurel-Atay, Independent Researcher
Johnny Chen, University of Oregon, USA
Wang Suk Suh, University of Oregon, USA
Lynn R. Kahle, University of Oregon, USA