Too Good to Be True Vs. Too High to Be Good: the Role of Product’S Price and Form of Incentive in Sales Promotion Evaluations
Too Good to be True vs. Too High to be Good: The Role of Product’s Price and Form of Incentive in Sales Promotion Evaluations
Study investigates how the form of incentive (monetary vs. nonmonetary) and the price level of a promoted product (normally priced vs. overpriced) affect consumers’ evaluations of economically identical deals. Although the first factor has received significant attention in previous research, only a modest degree of effort has been devoted to the second factor. Contrary to previous findings on strong positive effect of high implausible reference prices, results of this study indicate that when a promoted product is overpriced, respondents’ perceptions of the deal are significantly lower than when a promoted product is normally priced (regardless of the form of incentive).
Igor Makienko (2006) ,"Too Good to Be True Vs. Too High to Be Good: the Role of Product’S Price and Form of Incentive in Sales Promotion Evaluations", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 33, eds. Connie Pechmann and Linda Price, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 330-331.
Igor Makienko, Louisiana State University
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 33 | 2006
Effects of Brand Knowledge, Motivations, and Trust on Consumption Experience among Millennial Consumers
Ananya Rajagopal, Tecnológico de Monterrey, MEXICO
G8. How Does Pronunciation Difficulty of Brand Names Influence Consumer Responses? The Role of Self-Construal
Gunben Ceren Aksu, Rutgers University, USA
Yeni Zhou, Rutgers University, USA
Alokparna (Sonia) Monga, Rutgers University, USA
Worse is Bad: Asymmetric Inferences on Items and Assortments From Logically Equivalent Comparisons
Yoel Inbar, University of Toronto, Canada
Ellen Evers, University of California Berkeley, USA