Linking Gift Exchange Emotional Experiences and Interpersonal Relationships
ABSTRACT - Although emotions experienced by relationship partners pervade their exchange processes, the impact of emotions in contexts of consumption exchanges has not received much research attention. This study addresses this gap by focusing on five relationship outcomes associated with the experience of mixed emotions in a consumer-to-consumer setting. For this investigation, the context of gift receipt was used because it is highly relational and emotion-laden. The results showed that it is not the overall amount of one specific emotion or the combined amount of all experienced emotions that affect perceptions of relationship outcome. Instead, it is the relative combination of positive and negative emotions (e.g., more positive, balanced or more negative) that can be linked to the relationship outcomes (e.g., strengthening, negligible effect, weakening). Further, our results also suggest that even when the main emotional experience is negative (e.g., anger about getting the wrong gift), coping processes might be used by the recipient in order to avoid negative relationship consequences. Our findings are theoretically and practically relevant for marketing relationships of many types, including how individuals in commercial contexts experience their emotions and assess the state of their relationships.
Citation:
Julie A. Ruth, Frederic F. Brunel, and Cele C. Otnes (2003) ,"Linking Gift Exchange Emotional Experiences and Interpersonal Relationships", in E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 6, eds. Darach Turley and Stephen Brown, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 21.
Although emotions experienced by relationship partners pervade their exchange processes, the impact of emotions in contexts of consumption exchanges has not received much research attention. This study addresses this gap by focusing on five relationship outcomes associated with the experience of mixed emotions in a consumer-to-consumer setting. For this investigation, the context of gift receipt was used because it is highly relational and emotion-laden. The results showed that it is not the overall amount of one specific emotion or the combined amount of all experienced emotions that affect perceptions of relationship outcome. Instead, it is the relative combination of positive and negative emotions (e.g., more positive, balanced or more negative) that can be linked to the relationship outcomes (e.g., strengthening, negligible effect, weakening). Further, our results also suggest that even when the main emotional experience is negative (e.g., anger about getting the wrong gift), coping processes might be used by the recipient in order to avoid negative relationship consequences. Our findings are theoretically and practically relevant for marketing relationships of many types, including how individuals in commercial contexts experience their emotions and assess the state of their relationships. ----------------------------------------
Authors
Julie A. Ruth, Rutgers University-Camden, USA
Frederic F. Brunel, Boston University, USA
Cele C. Otnes, University of Illinois, USA
Volume
E - European Advances in Consumer Research Volume 6 | 2003
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
When Taking Action Means Accepting Responsibility: Omission Bias Predicts Reluctance to Vaccinate Due to Greater Anticipated Culpability for Negative Side Effects
Gary Sherman, Stony Brook University
Stacey R Finkelstein, Stony Brook University
Beth Vallen, Vilanova University, USA
Paul M Connell, Stony Brook University
Kristen Feemster, Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, USA
Featured
Effects of Brand Knowledge, Motivations, and Trust on Consumption Experience among Millennial Consumers
Ananya Rajagopal, Tecnológico de Monterrey, MEXICO
Featured
Cueing Backwards: Attention Processes in Multi-Attribute Choices
Antonia Krefeld-Schwalb, Geneva School of Economics and Management
Agnes Scholz, University of Zurich
Ursa Bernadic, Geneva School of Economics and Management
Benjamin Scheibehenne, Geneva School of Economics and Management