Bless Or Curse: How Top-Of-The Line Models Affect the Evaluation of Other Models

ABSTRACT - Two studies investigated how an extremely positive brand model (flagship) influences the evaluation of more moderate models. In Study 1 a flagship model elicited contrast in the evaluation of other more moderate models irrespective of whether these were of the same or a competitor brand. However, the contrast effect was eliminated for the same brand model when the shared brand-membership of the flagship and the more standard model was made salient. As a consequence the same brand model gained an advantage over a similar competitor. Study 2 provided evidence that by emphasizing the brand-membership of flagship and more moderate version the brand as a whole benefited which in turn favorably influenced any other brand member. Theoretically most noteworthy, Study 2 provided evidence that assimilation and contrast may not be exclusive to each other but may well work in parallel.



Citation:

Michaela Wanke and Herbert Bless (2001) ,"Bless Or Curse: How Top-Of-The Line Models Affect the Evaluation of Other Models", in AP - Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 4, eds. Paula M. Tidwell and Thomas E. Muller, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 275.

Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 4, 2001      Page 275

BLESS OR CURSE: HOW TOP-OF-THE LINE MODELS AFFECT THE EVALUATION OF OTHER MODELS

Michaela Wanke, Universitat Heidelberg, Germany

Herbert Bless, Universitat Mannheim, Germany

ABSTRACT -

Two studies investigated how an extremely positive brand model (flagship) influences the evaluation of more moderate models. In Study 1 a flagship model elicited contrast in the evaluation of other more moderate models irrespective of whether these were of the same or a competitor brand. However, the contrast effect was eliminated for the same brand model when the shared brand-membership of the flagship and the more standard model was made salient. As a consequence the same brand model gained an advantage over a similar competitor. Study 2 provided evidence that by emphasizing the brand-membership of flagship and more moderate version the brand as a whole benefited which in turn favorably influenced any other brand member. Theoretically most noteworthy, Study 2 provided evidence that assimilation and contrast may not be exclusive to each other but may well work in parallel.

----------------------------------------

Authors

Michaela Wanke, Universitat Heidelberg, Germany
Herbert Bless, Universitat Mannheim, Germany



Volume

AP - Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 4 | 2001



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

M4. How Consumption Experiences Create Value

Gia Nardini, University of Denver
Melissa Archpru Akaka, University of Denver
Deborah MacInnis, University of Southern California, USA
Richard J Lutz, University of Florida, USA

Read More

Featured

Influence of Visual Crowding and Space Between Products on Consumer Choice

Ana Scekic, HEC Paris, France
Selin Atalay, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Germany
Cathy Liu Yang, HEC Paris, France
Peter Ebbes, HEC Paris, France

Read More

Featured

Both Good from Afar…and Far from Good? Mental Representation Changes Consumer Preference for Products from a Brand with a Reputation for Innovativeness

Jeff Larson, Brigham Young University, USA
Kelly Goldsmith, Vanderbilt University, USA
BJ Allen, University of Arkansas, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.