New Insights on Consumer Decision Making
Citation:
Michal Ann Strahilevitz (1994) ,"New Insights on Consumer Decision Making", in AP - Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 1, eds. Joseph A. Cote and Siew Meng Leong, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 58.
The first paper, by Michal Strahilevitz, George Loewenstein, and Daniel Kahneman, discusses the results of a series of studies which suggest that the value placed on a possession may increase as a function of the amount of time that has elapsed since that object was acquired. Among the issues explored in this piece are the roles that adaptation and attachment play in determining value judgements, as well as the possible existence of "experiential appreciation." The paper concludes with a discussion of marketing implications regarding test runs (you can use it, but you can't take it home), free trial periods (you can take it home, but it is not yours), and money back guarantees (it is yours, but you may return it for a complete refund). The second paper, by Ravi Dhar and Drazen Prelec, examines the phenomenon of consumer choice among menus. The authors point out that many consumer decisions require an initial selection of a choice set or a "menu" (e.g., a store or a vacation location) from which a few items are subsequently purchased for consumption. In such cases, the general shape of the decision is often determined before the final stage, by the selection of groups of options. The research investigates the effects of both expanding the choice set by adding an inferior alternative, and of varying the degree of decision difficulty within a menu. Possible criteria for determining whether or not to offer flexible menus are among the managerial issues discussed in this paper. The final paper, by Fred Heath, focuses on the strategies which consumers use to justify their purchases to themselves. The research builds on previous work which suggests that consumers set budgets for classes of expenses and then monitor their expenditures against the appropriate budget(s). The author discusses how individual decision makers can use categorical reframing to justify desired but unusual expenditures (e.g., an expensive dinner can be assigned to the food budget, to the entertainment budget, or to some combination of the two). The results of this research suggest that by helping consumers to justify certain decisions, marketers can influence both the choices that are made and the satisfaction that results from those choices. ----------------------------------------
Authors
Michal Ann Strahilevitz, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Volume
AP - Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 1 | 1994
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
When Buffers Backfire: Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation and Consumer Response to Corporate Ethical Transgressions
Marlene Vock, Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam
Adrian Ward, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Margaret C. Campbell, University of Colorado, USA
Featured
When do More Options Produce Worse Choice?
Shannon Duncan, Columbia University, USA
Ulf Bockenholt, Northwestern University, USA
Eric J Johnson, Columbia University, USA
Featured
O2. The Streaking Star Effect: Why People Want Individual Winning Streaks to Continue More than Group Streaks
Jesse Walker, Cornell University, USA
Thomas Gilovich, Cornell University, USA