Anchors Or Targets? An Examination of Credit Card Statements

We propose a generalizable methodology for differentiating between (motivational) targets and (neutral) anchors. We use credit cards as a case study to explore the distinction. Through several experiments and examination of a large field data set, we find that values on credit card statements serve as motivating targets.



Citation:

Daniel Bartels and Abigail Sussman (2017) ,"Anchors Or Targets? An Examination of Credit Card Statements", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45, eds. Ayelet Gneezy, Vladas Griskevicius, and Patti Williams, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 346-349.

Authors

Daniel Bartels, University of Chicago, USA
Abigail Sussman, University of Chicago, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45 | 2017



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Cheating Your Self: Diagnostic Self-Deceptive Cheating for Intrinsic Rewards

Sara Loughran Dommer, Georgia Tech, USA
Nicole Marie Coleman, University of Pittsburgh, USA

Read More

Featured

When Zero Prices Backfire: A Dual-Process Model for Understanding Consumers’ Reactions to Zero Prices

Fengyan Cai, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Xiaomeng Fan, Northwestern University, USA
Galen V. Bodenhausen, Northwestern University, USA

Read More

Featured

From Novice to Know-it-All: How Google-Based Financial Learning Affects Financial Confidence and Decisions

Adrian Ward, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Tito L. H. Grillo, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Philip M. Fernbach, University of Colorado, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.