Maximizing Utility But Minimizing Wellbeing: a Meta-Analysis on the Maximizers’ Paradox

In an attempt to settle the debate on the relationship between maximization and well-being, a sub-group meta-analysis was conducted, accounting for well-being dimension valence (positive or negative). Findings revealed maximization is detrimental to well-being regardless of the dimension valence, but is moderated by the maximization scale and by long-term orientation.



Citation:

Alex Belli and François Carrillat (2017) ,"Maximizing Utility But Minimizing Wellbeing: a Meta-Analysis on the Maximizers’ Paradox", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45, eds. Ayelet Gneezy, Vladas Griskevicius, and Patti Williams, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 1073-1073.

Authors

Alex Belli, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
François Carrillat, University of Technology Sydney, Australia



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45 | 2017



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Product Ethicality Dilemma: Consumer Reactions to 'Disgusting' Recycled Products

Berna Basar, Baruch College, USA
Sankar Sen, Baruch College, USA

Read More

Featured

O1. Choice, Rejection, and Context Effects

Shih-Chieh Chuang, National Chung Cheng University
Yin-Hui Cheng, National Taichung University of Education

Read More

Featured

Easy To Be Selfish: Comparing the Influence of a Social Norm and an Individual Example

Zheshuai Yang, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Yan Zhang, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.