The Primacy of “What” Over “How Much”: How Type and Quantity Shape Healthiness Perceptions of Food Portions

Six studies test our proposal that consumers treat food type as a primary dimension and food quantity as a secondary dimension in health impact, such that a change in type (vs. quantity) has a greater impact on perceived health impact, even when holding objective impact constant in terms of calories.



Citation:

Peggy Liu, Kelly Haws, Karen Scherr, Joseph Redden, James Bettman, and Gavan Fitzsimons (2017) ,"The Primacy of “What” Over “How Much”: How Type and Quantity Shape Healthiness Perceptions of Food Portions", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45, eds. Ayelet Gneezy, Vladas Griskevicius, and Patti Williams, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 233-237.

Authors

Peggy Liu, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Kelly Haws, Vanderbilt University, USA
Karen Scherr, Duke University, USA
Joseph Redden, University of Minnesota, USA
James Bettman, Duke University, USA
Gavan Fitzsimons, Duke University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45 | 2017



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Cheating Your Self: Diagnostic Self-Deceptive Cheating for Intrinsic Rewards

Sara Loughran Dommer, Georgia Tech, USA
Nicole Marie Coleman, University of Pittsburgh, USA

Read More

Featured

Guilt Undermines Consumer Willingness to Buy More Meaningful Time

Ashley V. Whillans, Harvard Business School, USA
Elizabeth W. Dunn, University of British Columbia, Canada

Read More

Featured

Brand Fan(atic)s: When Excessive Brand Loyalty Sends the Wrong Signal

Isabelle Engeler, IESE Business School
Kate Barasz, IESE Business School

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.