Narrow Bracketing in Ethical Trade-Offs

We demonstrate narrow bracketing in ethical tradeoffs: individuals who don’t share in lab experiments but donate their (larger) earnings to charity (unethical + ethical) are evaluated less positively than those who share in-lab but later donate less (ethical + ethical) or nothing (ethical + neutral). Broad bracketing reverses these evaluations.



Citation:

Christopher Olivola and Silvia Saccardo (2017) ,"Narrow Bracketing in Ethical Trade-Offs", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45, eds. Ayelet Gneezy, Vladas Griskevicius, and Patti Williams, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 191-195.

Authors

Christopher Olivola, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Silvia Saccardo, Carnegie Mellon University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45 | 2017



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Pangs from Persuasion: When Recommendations Undermine Consumers’ Social Worth

Suzanne Galia Rath, Queens University, Canada
Laurence Ashworth, Queens University, Canada
Nicole Robitaille, Queens University, Canada

Read More

Featured

Burnishing Prosocial Image to Self vs. Others

Minah Jung, New York University, USA
Silvia Saccardo, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Ayelet Gneezy, University of California San Diego, USA
Leif D. Nelson, University of California Berkeley, USA

Read More

Featured

E5. Volunteer Motivations for Direct versus Indirect Service

Abigail Schneider, Regis University
Eric Hamerman, Iona College

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.