Opting in to Prosocial and Standard Incentives

In a series of field experiments, we examine whether prosocial incentives are effective in contexts in which people can avoid them. We find that people opt-out from prosocial incentives, especially when incentives are large, and even when they are optional (i.e. people have the option to donate their earnings).



Citation:

Daniel Schwartz , Elizabeth Keenan , Alex Imas , and Ayelet Gneezy (2017) ,"Opting in to Prosocial and Standard Incentives", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45, eds. Ayelet Gneezy, Vladas Griskevicius, and Patti Williams, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 238-242.

Authors

Daniel Schwartz , University of Chile, Chile
Elizabeth Keenan , Harvard University, USA
Alex Imas , Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Ayelet Gneezy , University of California San Diego, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45 | 2017



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

F11. Anti-Consumption for Sustainability: The Environmental Impact of Anti-Consumption Lifestyles, Environmentally Concerned Individuals and Ethical Consumers

Laurie Touchette, HEC Montreal, Canada
Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno, HEC Montreal, Canada

Read More

Featured

I13. Ambient Light, Gender, and Creativity

Courtney Szocs, Louisiana State University, USA
Franziska Metz, EBS
Dipayan Biswas, University of South Florida, USA

Read More

Featured

When News Gets Personal: The Evolution of Content in the Successive Retelling of Events

Shiri Melumad, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Yoon Duk Kim, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Robert Meyer, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Ani Nenkova, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.