A Case For Low Power: Self Versus Response Efficacy in Health Persuasion
This research investigates what types of health appeals persuade individuals with low (vs. high) power mindsets. Across different health scenarios, we show that self (vs. response) efficacy messages are less effective among low (vs. high) power individuals. Skepticism among low (vs. high) power individuals is the underlying novel process.
Meng-Hua Hsieh, Chethana Achar, and Nidhi Agrawal (2017) ,"A Case For Low Power: Self Versus Response Efficacy in Health Persuasion", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45, eds. Ayelet Gneezy, Vladas Griskevicius, and Patti Williams, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 665-666.
Meng-Hua Hsieh, Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg, USA
Chethana Achar, University of Washington, USA
Nidhi Agrawal, University of Washington, USA
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45 | 2017
Doing Worse by Doing Good: How Corporate Social Responsibility makes Products Less Dangerous
Linda Lemarié, University of Neuchâtel
Florent Girardin, University of Neuchâtel
F9. Protection against Deception: The Moderating Effects of Knowledge Calibration on Consumer Responses to Ambiguous Advertisement Information
Joel Alan Mohr, Queens University, Canada
Peter A. Dacin, Queens University, Canada
Exploring the Intersection of Digital Virtual Consumption and Family Rituals
Linda Tuncay Zayer, Loyola University Chicago, USA
Jenna Drenten, Loyola University Chicago, USA