Self-Controlled But Not Myself: When Restraint Versus Indulgence Undermines Consumers’ Authenticity and Decision Satisfaction

Consumer self-control is largely viewed as beneficial, but does it also have downsides? We show that for consumers low in lay rationalism, who rely less on reason than feelings when making decisions, resolving self-control conflicts through restraint (vs. indulgence) undermines decision satisfaction because it makes them feel less authentic.



Citation:

Michail D. Kokkoris, Erik Hoelzl, and Carlos Alós-Ferrer (2017) ,"Self-Controlled But Not Myself: When Restraint Versus Indulgence Undermines Consumers’ Authenticity and Decision Satisfaction", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45, eds. Ayelet Gneezy, Vladas Griskevicius, and Patti Williams, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 264-269.

Authors

Michail D. Kokkoris, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria
Erik Hoelzl, University of Cologne, Germany
Carlos Alós-Ferrer, University of Cologne, Germany



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45 | 2017



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Using a Meta-Analysis to Unravel Relative Importance of Postulated Explanations for the Endowment Effect

Peter Nguyen, Ivey Business School
Xin (Shane) Wang, Western University, Canada
David J. Curry, University of Cincinnati, USA

Read More

Featured

Consumers’ Implicit Mindsets and Responses to Cause-related Marketing Campaigns

Meng-Hua Hsieh, Kent State University, USA
Ozge Yucel-Aybat, Pennsylvania State University Harrisburg

Read More

Featured

Consuming Time-Space Imaginations: Bakhtin’s Chronotope on Robots and Artificial Intelligence

Marat Bakpayev, University of Minnesota Duluth, USA
Alima Yesmukanova, KIMEP University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.