Reason-Product (In)Compatibility: Cognition and Affect in Consumer Reasoning

Previous literature argues that reasoning about a decision leads to less satisfying choices. We introduce a distinction between "cognition-based" and "affect-based" reasons, and illustrate that reasoning reduces satisfaction only when it leads to a distortion in choice behavior as a function of an incompatibility between reason types and product categories.



Citation:

Alexander DePaoli, Uzma Khan, and Itamar Simonson (2017) ,"Reason-Product (In)Compatibility: Cognition and Affect in Consumer Reasoning", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45, eds. Ayelet Gneezy, Vladas Griskevicius, and Patti Williams, Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 583-584.

Authors

Alexander DePaoli, Northeastern University, USA
Uzma Khan, University of Miami, USA
Itamar Simonson, Stanford University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 45 | 2017



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Cultural Values and Consumers’ Brand Preference

Jessie J. Wang, Miami University, Ohio
Ashok K Lalwani, Indiana University, USA
Devon DelVecchio, Miami University, Ohio

Read More

Featured

Attention to missing information: The effect of novel disclosure methods

Nikolos M Gurney, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
George Loewenstein, Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Read More

Featured

When Does Being Paid an Hourly Wage Make it Difficult to Be a Happy Volunteer?

Sanford E. DeVoe, University of California Los Angeles, USA
Jieun Pai, University of California Los Angeles, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.