Seeking Justice: How Harmful Brands Cause Consumers to Punish, Cheat, and Steal

We examine how and why consumers engage in retributional acts directed towards brands that are perceived as harmful. Consumers are shown to lie, cheat, and steal as they attribute lower moral worth to harmful brands and this effect is shown to persist in the absence of any attributable brand transgression.



Citation:

Jeff Rotman, Mansur Khamitov, and Scott Connors (2016) ,"Seeking Justice: How Harmful Brands Cause Consumers to Punish, Cheat, and Steal", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44, eds. Page Moreau, Stefano Puntoni, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 605-606.

Authors

Jeff Rotman, Ivey Business School, Canada
Mansur Khamitov, Ivey Business School, Canada
Scott Connors, Washington State University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44 | 2016



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

The Messy Satiation Effect: The Benefits of Eating Like a Pig

Kevin L. Sample, University of Georgia, USA
Kelly Haws, Vanderbilt University, USA

Read More

Featured

Green Biases: Consumer Evaluations of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Sources

Nathan Dhaliwal, University of British Columbia, Canada
David Hardisty, University of British Columbia, Canada
Jiaying Zhang, University of British Columbia, Canada

Read More

Featured

A10. Opting Opt-in or Out? Effects of Defaults on Perceived Control and Valuation of Personal Data

Iris van Ooijen, University of Twente

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.