Anecdotal Versus Statistical Evidence in Risk Communication Messages: the Moderating Effects of Comparative Optimism and Message Framing

Risk communication often contains anecdotal or statistical evidence. Research on the effectiveness of both evidence types reports contractionary findings. Based on construal level theory, this research shows that the moderation of evidence type by message framing depends on comparative optimism. Results reveal that optimists are persuaded by negative anecdotal evidence.



Citation:

Marina Isabel Wieluch (2016) ,"Anecdotal Versus Statistical Evidence in Risk Communication Messages: the Moderating Effects of Comparative Optimism and Message Framing", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44, eds. Page Moreau, Stefano Puntoni, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 681-682.

Authors

Marina Isabel Wieluch, Bundeswehr University Munich



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44 | 2016



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

More than just a number: The negative effect of 100% claims

Nira Munichor, Bar-Ilan University
Liat Levontin, Technion University, Israel

Read More

Featured

Repeat Performances Decrease Consumer Perceptions of Authenticity

Rachel Gershon, Washington University, USA
Rosanna Smith, University of Georgia, USA

Read More

Featured

Marketing’s Ethical Blind Spot: The Problem with Catering to Customer Preferences

Suneal Bedi, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Sonu Bedi, Dartmouth College, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.