Postponement Specificity Differentially Affects Desire and Consumption

For self-control facilitation, specific plans are thought to be superior to their unspecific counterparts. However, the current work suggests that unspecific plans are most effective for reducing unwanted behavior. Four experiments demonstrate that unspecific postponement but not specific postponement reduces consumption of a postponed temptation through a weakening of desire.



Citation:

Nicole L. Mead and Vanessa M. Patrick (2016) ,"Postponement Specificity Differentially Affects Desire and Consumption", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44, eds. Page Moreau, Stefano Puntoni, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 88-92.

Authors

Nicole L. Mead, University of Melbourne, Australia
Vanessa M. Patrick, University of Houston, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44 | 2016



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Identity Threats, Compensatory Consumption and Working Memory Capacity: When and Why Feeling Threatened Leads to Heightened Evaluations of Identity-Relevant Products

Read More

Featured

Trust in Doubt: Co-Chair's Invited Panel

Adam Berinsky, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
John Gray, MentionMapp.com
Andre Spicer, City University of London, UK

Read More

Featured

I, Me, Mine: The Effect of the Explicitness of Self-Anchoring on Consumer Evaluations

Adrienne E Foos, Mercyhurst University
Kathleen A Keeling, University of Manchester, UK
Debbie I Keeling, University of Sussex

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.