Need and Intertemporal Choice: a Dual Goal Hypothesis

In 5 studies we support the dual-goal hypothesis for the effects of need on intertemporal decisions. We find consumers of high (vs. low) need are more impatient in near future intertemporal decisions yet more patient in distant future intertemporal decisions. These studies enrich current understanding on how need affects patience.



Citation:

Xianchi Dai, Canice M.C. Kwan, and Ayelet Fishbach (2016) ,"Need and Intertemporal Choice: a Dual Goal Hypothesis", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44, eds. Page Moreau, Stefano Puntoni, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 88-92.

Authors

Xianchi Dai, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
Canice M.C. Kwan, Lingnan College, Sun Yat-Sen University, China
Ayelet Fishbach, University of Chicago, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44 | 2016



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

To Touch or Not to Touch?: How Touch Influences Decision Confidence

Sang Kyu Park, University of Florida, USA
Yang Yang, University of Florida, USA

Read More

Featured

M8. Nostalgia Increases Healthy Attitudes and Behaviors

Jannine Lasaleta, Yeshiva University
Carolina O. C. Werle, Grenoble Ecole de Management
Amanda Pruski Yamim, Grenoble Ecole de Management

Read More

Featured

The Neutral Face of Blue: How Color Can Make Consumers Stay Sensitive

Sung Hee Wendy Paik, University of Oregon, USA
Jiao Zhang, University of Oregon, USA
Aparna Sundar, University of Oregon, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.