Is It More Rational to Say “No”?: How Choosing Versus Rejecting Alternatives Affects Information Processing

We propose that task type (choice versus rejection) can shift decision-making from the heuristic-based System-1 processing (in choice), to the deliberative System-2 processing (in rejection). Seven experiments replicate results from prior studies in the choice task and then show how these results change when a rejection task is used.



Citation:

Tatiana Sokolova and Aradhna Krishna (2016) ,"Is It More Rational to Say “No”?: How Choosing Versus Rejecting Alternatives Affects Information Processing", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44, eds. Page Moreau, Stefano Puntoni, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 185-189.

Authors

Tatiana Sokolova, University of Michigan, USA
Aradhna Krishna, University of Michigan, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44 | 2016



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

The Embodiment of Repair: Consumer Experiences of Material Singularity and Practice Disruption

Matthew Godfrey, University of Arizona, USA
Linda L Price, University of Oregon, USA
Robert F. Lusch, University of Arizona, USA

Read More

Featured

L3. Categorizing Engagement Behaviors from the Perspective of Customer Resources

Xianfang Zeng, University of Calgary, Canada
James Agarwal, University of Calgary, Canada
Mehdi Mourali, University of Calgary, Canada

Read More

Featured

Paper Box or Plastic bag? Structural Package Design Elements Affect Health Perception and Consumption.

Joyce De Temmerman, Ghent University, Belgium
Iris Vermeir, Ghent University, Belgium
Hendrik Slabbinck, Ghent University, Belgium

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.