The Population Penalty: Why Common Brands Benefit From Dense Populations Less Than Uncommon Brands

This research suggests that the relationship between population and sales in a given area grows weaker as brands become more common. Consumers in densely populated areas are motivated to express their distinctiveness, reducing their preference for common brands, creating implications for how large chain retailers select sites.



Citation:

Ted Matherly, Zachary Arens, and Todd Arnold (2016) ,"The Population Penalty: Why Common Brands Benefit From Dense Populations Less Than Uncommon Brands", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44, eds. Page Moreau, Stefano Puntoni, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 552-553.

Authors

Ted Matherly, Oklahoma State University, USA
Zachary Arens, Oklahoma State University, USA
Todd Arnold, Oklahoma State University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44 | 2016



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Taking a Leaf out of my Review: The Asymmetrical Link between Linguistic Similarity and Attitude Certainty for Writers and Readers of Product Reviews

Ann Kronrod, University of Massachusetts, USA
Yakov Bart, Northeastern University, USA

Read More

Featured

M8. Nostalgia Increases Healthy Attitudes and Behaviors

Jannine Lasaleta, Yeshiva University
Carolina O. C. Werle, Grenoble Ecole de Management
Amanda Pruski Yamim, Grenoble Ecole de Management

Read More

Featured

Reversing the Experiential Advantage: Happiness Leads People to Perceive Purchases as More Experiential than Material

Hyewon Oh, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Joseph K Goodman, Ohio State University, USA
Incheol Choi, Seoul National University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.