Clicking Decisions and the Coexistence of Insufficient and Excessive Checking

We examines the impact of past experiences on the tendency to use easy “single-click checking” options in simplified settings. The results reveal the co-existence of insufficient and excessive checking. The direction of the deviation is captured with the hypothesis that consumers exhibit oversensitivity to the best in retrospect outcome.



Citation:

Yefim Roth, Michaela Wänke , and Ido Erev (2016) ,"Clicking Decisions and the Coexistence of Insufficient and Excessive Checking", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44, eds. Page Moreau, Stefano Puntoni, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 755-755.

Authors

Yefim Roth, Technion University, Israel
Michaela Wänke , University of Mannheim, Germany
Ido Erev, Technion University, Israel



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44 | 2016



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Non-normative influence of self-decided prices on product-related inferences

Sudipta Mukherjee, Virginia Tech, USA
Mario Pandelaere, Virginia Tech, USA

Read More

Featured

Anticipated Interpersonal Feedback Reshapes Other-oriented Intertemporal Choices

Adelle Xue Yang, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Oleg Urminsky, University of Chicago, USA

Read More

Featured

Turning the Titanic: Creating Consumer-Centric Cultures and Improved Consumer Experience in Large, Established Health Care Systems

Gregory Carpenter, Northwestern University, USA
Beth Leavenworth DuFault, University at Albany
Ashlee Humphreys, Northwestern University - Medill, USA
Lez Ecima Trujillo Torres, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.