Clicking Decisions and the Coexistence of Insufficient and Excessive Checking

We examines the impact of past experiences on the tendency to use easy “single-click checking” options in simplified settings. The results reveal the co-existence of insufficient and excessive checking. The direction of the deviation is captured with the hypothesis that consumers exhibit oversensitivity to the best in retrospect outcome.



Citation:

Yefim Roth, Michaela Wänke , and Ido Erev (2016) ,"Clicking Decisions and the Coexistence of Insufficient and Excessive Checking", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44, eds. Page Moreau, Stefano Puntoni, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 755-755.

Authors

Yefim Roth, Technion University, Israel
Michaela Wänke , University of Mannheim, Germany
Ido Erev, Technion University, Israel



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44 | 2016



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Born to Shop? A Genetic Component of Deal Proneness

Robert M Schindler, Rutgers University, USA
Vishal Lala, Pace University
Jeanette Taylor, Florida State University

Read More

Featured

Q12. Exploring Effects of Perceived Authenticity Of Instagram Models on Aad and Buying Intentions

Heather Shoenberger, University of Oregon, USA
Eunjin Kim, Southern Methodist University, USA

Read More

Featured

D11. A Hidden Cost of Advocating: Attitude Depolarization After Recommending

Ravini Savindya Abeywickrama, University of Melbourne, Australia
Gergely Nyilasy, University of Melbourne, Australia
Simon M. Laham, University of Melbourne, Australia

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.