Comparison Focus: the Asymmetric Impact of Context Effects on Advantaged Versus Disadvantaged Options

In this paper we advance a new hypothesis, comparison focus, that invokes the relative advantage of one option over another in the baseline set to predict how changes in choice set configuration influence choice shares. Comparison focus predicts both replications and reversals of established context effects.



Citation:

Ioannis Evangelidis, Jonathan Levav, and Itamar Simonson (2016) ,"Comparison Focus: the Asymmetric Impact of Context Effects on Advantaged Versus Disadvantaged Options", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44, eds. Page Moreau, Stefano Puntoni, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 435-435.

Authors

Ioannis Evangelidis, Bocconi University, Italy
Jonathan Levav, Stanford University, USA
Itamar Simonson, Stanford University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 44 | 2016



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

B10. Wearing V Neck, Getting More Trust: An Evolutionary Psychology Approach to Examine the Effect of Collar Style on Trust

jialiang xu, University of Manitoba, Canada
Fang Wan, University of Manitoba, Canada
chenbo zhong, University of Toronto, Canada

Read More

Featured

The Effects of Breadth of Product Categories on Budgeting

An Tran, University of La Verne
John Lynch, University of Colorado, USA

Read More

Featured

A5. Trusting the Tweeting President: Inside the Donald's reality: Gaslighting, pschometrics and social media

Dianne Dean, University of Hull
Fiona Walkley, Hull University Business School
Robin Croft, Brunel University

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.