Risk Is Weird

We propose that the presence of unusual mechanisms used to introduce risk, rather than risk itself, is a primary driver of what has been considered “risk aversion.” Even in the absence of uncertainty, participants in four studies valued items in “weird” scenarios less than they did in more straightforward questions.



Citation:

Robert Mislavsky and Uri Simonsohn (2015) ,"Risk Is Weird", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43, eds. Kristin Diehl , Carolyn Yoon, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 132-135.

Authors

Robert Mislavsky, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Uri Simonsohn, University of Pennsylvania, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43 | 2015



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

P6. Marginal Cost Consideration

Ethan Pew, Stony Brook University
Hyunhwan Lee, University of Miami, USA

Read More

Featured

When Stigma Does Good: Accentuating Certain Aspects of Stigma Enhances Effectiveness of Mental Health Messages

Chethana Achar, University of Washington, USA
Nidhi Agrawal, University of Washington, USA

Read More

Featured

Round It Up: Preference Exists for Rounded Totals (PERT)

Varun Sharma, Bocconi University, Italy
aradhna krishna, University of Michigan, USA
Zachary Estes, Bocconi University, Italy

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.