Prosocial Incentives: Limits and Benefits of Working For Others

Using a combination of lab and field experiments, we demonstrate that prosocial incentives, where effort is tied directly to charitable contributions, can be more effective in motivating effort and participation than standard self-benefiting incentives. Prosocial incentives are particularly effective when stakes are low and decisions are made public.



Citation:

Alex Imas, Elizabeth Keenan, and Ayelet Gneezy (2015) ,"Prosocial Incentives: Limits and Benefits of Working For Others", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43, eds. Kristin Diehl , Carolyn Yoon, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 170-175.

Authors

Alex Imas, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Elizabeth Keenan, University of California San Diego, USA
Ayelet Gneezy, University of California San Diego, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43 | 2015



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Hindsight Value: Failed Transactions Inform Willingness to Pay

Masha Ksendzova, Boston University, USA
Carey K. Morewedge, Boston University, USA
Dan Ariely, Duke University, USA

Read More

Featured

Conducting Consumer-Relevant Research

Jeffrey Inman, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Margaret C. Campbell, University of Colorado, USA
Amna Kirmani, University of Maryland, USA
Linda L Price, University of Oregon, USA

Read More

Featured

Liminality, Portals, and Narratives of Transformation

Laetitia Mimoun, HEC Paris, France
Fleura Bardhi, City University of London, UK

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.