Decision By Sampling and Better/Worse-Than-Average Effects

We offer and test a new account, based on a decision process-level theory called Decision by Sampling, of understanding the psychology underlying people’s tendency to believe that their ability to perform a certain task is better [worse] than average on easy [hard] tasks.



Citation:

John Han and Christopher Olivola (2015) ,"Decision By Sampling and Better/Worse-Than-Average Effects", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43, eds. Kristin Diehl , Carolyn Yoon, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 788-788.

Authors

John Han, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Christopher Olivola, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43 | 2015



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Q9. Free or Fee? Consumers’ Decision to Pay for the Premium Version of a Music Streaming Service Rather than Using its Free Version

Sebastian Danckwerts, Heinrich-Heine-University
Peter Kenning, Heinrich-Heine-University

Read More

Featured

How the Voice Persuades

Alex Van Zant, Rutgers University, USA
Jonah Berger, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Featured

Unobserved Altruism: How Social- And Self-Signaling Motivations Shape Willingness to Donate

Jennifer Savary, University of Arizona, USA
Kelly Goldsmith, Vanderbilt University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.