Decision By Sampling and Better/Worse-Than-Average Effects

We offer and test a new account, based on a decision process-level theory called Decision by Sampling, of understanding the psychology underlying people’s tendency to believe that their ability to perform a certain task is better [worse] than average on easy [hard] tasks.



Citation:

John Han and Christopher Olivola (2015) ,"Decision By Sampling and Better/Worse-Than-Average Effects", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43, eds. Kristin Diehl , Carolyn Yoon, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 788-788.

Authors

John Han, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Christopher Olivola, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43 | 2015



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Alternative Worldviews on Human – Nonhuman Relations: The Turkish Case

N. Alican Mecit, HEC Paris, France
tina m. lowrey, HEC Paris, France

Read More

Featured

So-Bad-It’s-Good: When Consumers Prefer Bad Options

Evan Weingarten, University of California San Diego, USA
Amit Bhattacharjee, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Patti Williams, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Featured

R5. Autonomy or Enjoyment? The Contingent Nature of Brand Ritual

Yaxuan Ran, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
Echo Wen Wan, University of Hong Kong

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.