'Having It All' May Not Always Be Good: the Effects of Complementary Traits and Belief in a Just World on Brand Evaluations

In two experiments, we provide evidence that non-complementary brands – those whose products have monopoly on many of valued traits – are evaluated more negatively among people who value fairness and justice. Such brands can be seen as unfair and violate consumer’s expectations regarding tradeoffs between attributes.



Citation:

Steven Shepherd and Renaud Lunardo (2015) ,"'Having It All' May Not Always Be Good: the Effects of Complementary Traits and Belief in a Just World on Brand Evaluations", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43, eds. Kristin Diehl , Carolyn Yoon, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 806-806.

Authors

Steven Shepherd, Oklahoma State University, USA
Renaud Lunardo, Kedge Business School, France



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43 | 2015



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

A Theory of Goal Maintenance: A Distinct and Vivid Pre-Goal Self Predicts Post-Goal Maintenance Behavior

Elicia John, University of California Los Angeles, USA
Hal Hershfield, University of California Los Angeles, USA
Suzanne Shu, University of California Los Angeles, USA

Read More

Featured

Brands as Complex Social Processes

Andrea Hemetsberger, University of Innsbruck, Austria
Hans Mühlbacher, International University of Monaco
Eric J Arnould, Aalto University, Finland

Read More

Featured

Pretty Healthy Food: How Prettiness Amplifies Perceived Healthiness

Linda Hagen, University of Southern California, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.