'Having It All' May Not Always Be Good: the Effects of Complementary Traits and Belief in a Just World on Brand Evaluations

In two experiments, we provide evidence that non-complementary brands – those whose products have monopoly on many of valued traits – are evaluated more negatively among people who value fairness and justice. Such brands can be seen as unfair and violate consumer’s expectations regarding tradeoffs between attributes.



Citation:

Steven Shepherd and Renaud Lunardo (2015) ,"'Having It All' May Not Always Be Good: the Effects of Complementary Traits and Belief in a Just World on Brand Evaluations", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43, eds. Kristin Diehl , Carolyn Yoon, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 806-806.

Authors

Steven Shepherd, Oklahoma State University, USA
Renaud Lunardo, Kedge Business School, France



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43 | 2015



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

The "Healthy=Lighter" Heuristic

Nico Heuvinck, IESEG School of Management
Yi Li, Macquarie University
Mario Pandelaere, Virginia Tech, USA

Read More

Featured

“I Desire A Brand When I See How They are Different from Me”: Differential Effects of Blatant and Subtle Brand Rejection

Jun Yan, University of Manitoba, Canada
Fang Wan, University of Manitoba, Canada
Americus Reed, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Featured

How the Unconstructed Identity Relieves Consumers of Identity-Relevant Consumption

Tracy Rank-Christman, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA
Lauren Poupis, Iona College

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.