The Informational Value of Dissimilarity in Interpersonal Influence
We show that advisees don't discount advice received from dissimilar advisors, but use this as information based on which they infer more general dissimilarity, including in the advice domain. Consequently, consumers contrast their opinions and choices away from those of dissimilar advisors. We show the cognitive nature of this process.
Mirjam Tuk, Peeter Verlegh, Ale Smidts, and Daniel Wigboldus (2015) ,"The Informational Value of Dissimilarity in Interpersonal Influence", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43, eds. Kristin Diehl , Carolyn Yoon, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 723-724.
Mirjam Tuk, Imperial College London, United Kingdom & Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Peeter Verlegh, VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ale Smidts, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Daniel Wigboldus, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43 | 2015
Can Implicit Theory Influence Construal Level?
Olya Bullard, University of Winnipeg
Sara Penner, University of Manitoba, Canada
Kelley Main, University of Manitoba, Canada
Emotional Volatility and Cultural Success
Jonah Berger, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Yoon Duk Kim, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Robert Meyer, University of Pennsylvania, USA
P3. Cash Costs You: The Pain of Holding
J Zenkic, University of Melbourne, Australia
Kobe Millet, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Nicole Mead, University of Melbourne, Australia