Competitive Forces When Choosing From Assortments of Varying Size: How Holistic Thinking Mitigates Choice Overload

Researchers disagree whether large assortments increase or decrease satisfaction. By systematically examining and testing the two competing forces (variety effect, overload effect) underlying choice overload effects, we show why inconsistencies might exist. Further, we identify a new moderator – holistic thinking – that mitigates the negative effect of overload feelings on satisfaction.



Citation:

Ilgim Dara and Elizabeth G Miller (2015) ,"Competitive Forces When Choosing From Assortments of Varying Size: How Holistic Thinking Mitigates Choice Overload", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43, eds. Kristin Diehl , Carolyn Yoon, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 502-503.

Authors

Ilgim Dara, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA
Elizabeth G Miller, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43 | 2015



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Consumer Attachment Styles and Preference for Sharing Products

Kivilcim Dogerlioglu Demir, Sabanci University
Ezgi Akpinar, Koc University, Turkey
mehmet okan, ITU

Read More

Featured

A Model of Consumer Self-Regulation Failure

Keith Wilcox, Columbia University, USA

Read More

Featured

Why is 1 out of 20 Riskier than 5%? Effect of Representing Unlikely Events as Frequency versus Percentage on Risk Perceptions

Nevena T Koukova, Lehigh University
Joydeep Srivastava, Temple University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.