Reversal of the Compromise Effect: the Case of Negative Goods

We demonstrate that compromise effect may be one manifestation of the more overarching hedonic maximization principle, first put forth by Thaler (1985). Accordingly, we find a reversal for the effect in negative domains, where middle options (i.e., segregated losses) provide higher disutility to consumers than extreme options (i.e., integrated losses).



Citation:

Nükhet Agar and Baler Bilgin (2015) ,"Reversal of the Compromise Effect: the Case of Negative Goods", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43, eds. Kristin Diehl , Carolyn Yoon, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 775-775.

Authors

Nükhet Agar, Koc University, Turkey
Baler Bilgin, Koc University, Turkey



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43 | 2015



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Enhancing Perceptions toward In-Home Artificial Intelligence Devices through Trust: Anthropomorphism and Non-Branded Device Messages

Seth Ketron, East Carolina University
Brian Taillon, East Carolina University
Christine Kowalczyk, East Carolina University

Read More

Featured

L14. Christmas Decorations in September – What Happened to Halloween? The Effect of Prospective Event Markers on Time Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Promotions

Chaumanix Dutton, University of Southern California, USA
Kristin Diehl, University of Southern California, USA

Read More

Featured

Trusting the data, the self and “the other” in self tracking practices

Dorthe Brogård Kristensen, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.