Reversal of the Compromise Effect: the Case of Negative Goods
We demonstrate that compromise effect may be one manifestation of the more overarching hedonic maximization principle, first put forth by Thaler (1985). Accordingly, we find a reversal for the effect in negative domains, where middle options (i.e., segregated losses) provide higher disutility to consumers than extreme options (i.e., integrated losses).
Nükhet Agar and Baler Bilgin (2015) ,"Reversal of the Compromise Effect: the Case of Negative Goods", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43, eds. Kristin Diehl , Carolyn Yoon, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 775-775.
Nükhet Agar, Koc University, Turkey
Baler Bilgin, Koc University, Turkey
NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 43 | 2015
Enhancing Perceptions toward In-Home Artificial Intelligence Devices through Trust: Anthropomorphism and Non-Branded Device Messages
Seth Ketron, East Carolina University
Brian Taillon, East Carolina University
Christine Kowalczyk, East Carolina University
L14. Christmas Decorations in September – What Happened to Halloween? The Effect of Prospective Event Markers on Time Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Promotions
Chaumanix Dutton, University of Southern California, USA
Kristin Diehl, University of Southern California, USA
Trusting the data, the self and “the other” in self tracking practices
Dorthe Brogård Kristensen, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark