Does It Matter Who Should Be Blamed? Minimizing Customer Aggression When Service Failed

This empirical paper addresses how customer aggression varies as a function of cognitive and emotional arousals after service failure. It extends attribution theory by examining group empowerment and face as moderating effects in negative emotion-aggression relationship. This paper also adds customer skepticism as a mediating effect in attribution-negative emotion relationship.



Citation:

Jun M Luo, Martin J Liu, Ruizhi Yuan, and Natalia Yannopoulou (2015) ,"Does It Matter Who Should Be Blamed? Minimizing Customer Aggression When Service Failed", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11, eds. Echo Wen Wan, Meng Zhang, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 287-188.

Authors

Jun M Luo, Nottingham University Business School China
Martin J Liu, Nottingham University Business School China
Ruizhi Yuan, Nottingham University Business School China
Natalia Yannopoulou, New Castle University Business School



Volume

AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11 | 2015



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

M1. How Rewarding is Your Rewards Program? Experiential vs. Material Rewards

Ayalla Ruvio, Michigan State University, USA
Farnoosh Khodakarami, Michigan State University, USA
Clay Voorhees, Michigan State University, USA

Read More

Featured

Brand Fan(atic)s: When Excessive Brand Loyalty Sends the Wrong Signal

Isabelle Engeler, IESE Business School
Kate Barasz, IESE Business School

Read More

Featured

How the Voice Persuades

Alex Van Zant, Rutgers University, USA
Jonah Berger, University of Pennsylvania, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.