Does It Matter Who Should Be Blamed? Minimizing Customer Aggression When Service Failed
This empirical paper addresses how customer aggression varies as a function of cognitive and emotional arousals after service failure. It extends attribution theory by examining group empowerment and face as moderating effects in negative emotion-aggression relationship. This paper also adds customer skepticism as a mediating effect in attribution-negative emotion relationship.
Citation:
Jun M Luo, Martin J Liu, Ruizhi Yuan, and Natalia Yannopoulou (2015) ,"Does It Matter Who Should Be Blamed? Minimizing Customer Aggression When Service Failed", in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11, eds. Echo Wen Wan, Meng Zhang, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 287-188.
Authors
Jun M Luo, Nottingham University Business School China
Martin J Liu, Nottingham University Business School China
Ruizhi Yuan, Nottingham University Business School China
Natalia Yannopoulou, New Castle University Business School
Volume
AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11 | 2015
Share Proceeding
Featured papers
See MoreFeatured
M1. How Rewarding is Your Rewards Program? Experiential vs. Material Rewards
Ayalla Ruvio, Michigan State University, USA
Farnoosh Khodakarami, Michigan State University, USA
Clay Voorhees, Michigan State University, USA
Featured
Brand Fan(atic)s: When Excessive Brand Loyalty Sends the Wrong Signal
Isabelle Engeler, IESE Business School
Kate Barasz, IESE Business School
Featured
How the Voice Persuades
Alex Van Zant, Rutgers University, USA
Jonah Berger, University of Pennsylvania, USA