Two Types of Negativity Biases in Comparative Evaluations

We examine the effect of attribute framing on product comparisons and find that perceived difference between products changes with framing. We first identify two types of attribute frames (valence and complementary framing), which lead to two different negativity biases: negativity potency and negativity dominance. In line with our theorizing, our experiments show that, in ‘valence framing’, evaluations of two products differ more when attribute is negatively (vs. positively) framed. For ‘complementary framing’, however, we observe the opposite: perceived difference is larger in positive (vs. negative) frame. Our results also indicate that negative information actually goes through two diverse evaluation processes.



Citation:

Selin Erguncu and Serdar Sayman (2014) ,"Two Types of Negativity Biases in Comparative Evaluations", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 783-783.

Authors

Selin Erguncu, Koc University
Serdar Sayman, Koc University



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Memory-Based Models of Predicting Inferences about Brand Quality

Yvetta Simonyan, University of Bath, UK
Dan Goldstein, Microsoft Research

Read More

Featured

J13. The Good and Bad of a Delayed Indulgence: Effects on Self-Perceptions and Purchase Satisfaction

Argiro Kliamenakis, Concordia University, Canada
Kamila Sobol, Concordia University, Canada

Read More

Featured

Influence of Visual Crowding and Space Between Products on Consumer Choice

Ana Scekic, HEC Paris, France
Selin Atalay, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Germany
Cathy Liu Yang, HEC Paris, France
Peter Ebbes, HEC Paris, France

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.