Following-Through Opportunities: the Effects of Incidental Versus Inherent Choices

Consumers often plan to pursue desirable opportunities yet fail to follow-through. We identify cases where consumers feel that by failing to follow-through on a selected opportunity, they miss-out not only on that opportunity but also on an outside opportunity unavailable to them. This inflated perception of opportunity-cost increases opportunity follow-through.



Citation:

Liad Weiss and Ran Kivetz (2014) ,"Following-Through Opportunities: the Effects of Incidental Versus Inherent Choices", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 210-214.

Authors

Liad Weiss, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Ran Kivetz, Columbia University, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

G8. How Does Pronunciation Difficulty of Brand Names Influence Consumer Responses? The Role of Self-Construal

Gunben Ceren Aksu, Rutgers University, USA
Yeni Zhou, Rutgers University, USA
Alokparna (Sonia) Monga, Rutgers University, USA

Read More

Featured

The Role of Expectations About Changes in Wealth in Discounting Decisions

Abigail Sussman, University of Chicago, USA
Oleg Urminsky, University of Chicago, USA
Shweta Desiraju, University of Chicago, USA

Read More

Featured

Liminal Motherhood: Relational Partners Experience of Liminality

Adriana Schneider Dallolio, Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV-EAESP
Eliane Zamith Brito, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.