Following-Through Opportunities: the Effects of Incidental Versus Inherent Choices

Consumers often plan to pursue desirable opportunities yet fail to follow-through. We identify cases where consumers feel that by failing to follow-through on a selected opportunity, they miss-out not only on that opportunity but also on an outside opportunity unavailable to them. This inflated perception of opportunity-cost increases opportunity follow-through.


Liad Weiss and Ran Kivetz (2014) ,"Following-Through Opportunities: the Effects of Incidental Versus Inherent Choices", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 210-214.


Liad Weiss, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA
Ran Kivetz, Columbia University, USA


NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014

Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More


Brand Fan(atic)s: When Excessive Brand Loyalty Sends the Wrong Signal

Isabelle Engeler, IESE Business School
Kate Barasz, IESE Business School

Read More


Flavor Fatigue: How Cognitive Depletion Reduces Enjoyment of Complex Flavors

Rhonda Hadi, Oxford University, UK
Dan Rubin, St. John’s University
Diogo Hildebrand, Baruch College, USA
Thomas Kramer, University of California Riverside, USA

Read More


G6. Brightness Increases More Positive Views of Humanity and Prosocial Behavior of People Low in Moral Identity Internalization

Jun Yan, University of Manitoba, Canada
Luke Zhu, University of Manitoba, Canada
Fang Wan, University of Manitoba, Canada

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.