The Urgency Bias

Employing simplified games and real-life consequential choices, we provide evidence for “urgency bias”, showing that people prefer working on urgent (vs. important) tasks that have shorter (vs. longer) completion window however involving smaller (vs. bigger) outcomes, even when task difficulty, goal gradient, outcome scarcity and task interdependence are held constant.



Citation:

Meng Zhu, Yang Yang, and Christopher K. Hsee (2014) ,"The Urgency Bias ", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 86-90.

Authors

Meng Zhu, Johns Hopkins University
Yang Yang, Carnegie Mellon University
Christopher K. Hsee, University of Chicago



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

The Influence of Virtual versus Actual Identity on Impulsive Consumption

Chia-Wei Joy Lin, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, USA
Yinlong Zhang, University of Texas at San Antonio, USA
Lawrence Feick, University of Pittsburgh, USA

Read More

Featured

2-C: “We are Breaking Up”: The Direct and Mediating Effects of Conceptual Metaphors on Brand Relationships

Alberto Lopez, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico
Martin Reimann, University of Arizona, USA
Raquel Castaño, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico

Read More

Featured

9-S: Presentation Style Affects Decision Processes: A Dietary Choice Study

Mona Prakash, Duke University, USA
Jonathan Winkle, Duke University, USA
Nicolette Sullivan, Duke University, USA
Gavan Fitzsimons, Duke University, USA
John Pearson, Duke University, USA
Scott Huettel, Duke University, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.