The Better of Two 'Goods’: Choice Given a Trade-Off Between Pro-Social and Pro-Environmental Performance

Using mixed methods, this research suggests that consumers perceive the environmental and social dimensions of sustainability as psychologically distinct in several meaningful ways. Specifically, we find that consumers perceive environmental (social) sustainability as more psychologically abstract (concrete) and demonstrate how these differences can be used to predict sustainable product choice.



Citation:

Michael Luchs, Jesse Catlin, and Marcus Phipps (2014) ,"The Better of Two 'Goods’: Choice Given a Trade-Off Between Pro-Social and Pro-Environmental Performance", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 588-589.

Authors

Michael Luchs, The College of William & Mary, USA
Jesse Catlin, California State University, Sacramento, USA
Marcus Phipps, University of Melbourne, Australia



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

In Praise of Pleasure: Hedonic Consumption Fosters Prosocial Behavior

Daniela Cristian, City University of London, UK
Bob Fennis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Luk Warlop, Norwegian School of Management, Norway

Read More

Featured

Let's Get Together and Make a Difference: Experiencing a Community in Donation-Based Crowdfunding

Danit Ein-Gar, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Read More

Featured

Brand Fan(atic)s: When Excessive Brand Loyalty Sends the Wrong Signal

Isabelle Engeler, IESE Business School
Kate Barasz, IESE Business School

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.