Guilt Versus Shame Appeals: the Role of Regulatory Focus and Efficacy in the Understanding the Effectiveness of Distracted Driving Messages

The purpose of this study is to integrate regulatory focus theory and efficacy to better understand the effectiveness of guilt and shame appeals in distracted driving advertising campaigns. The study predicts that the fit between emotional appeals and regulatory foci will increase persuasion and it occurs through different efficacy salience.



Citation:

Kathrynn Pounders, Seungae Lee, and Arnold DongWoo Chung (2014) ,"Guilt Versus Shame Appeals: the Role of Regulatory Focus and Efficacy in the Understanding the Effectiveness of Distracted Driving Messages", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 806-806.

Authors

Kathrynn Pounders, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Seungae Lee, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Arnold DongWoo Chung, University of Texas at Austin, USA



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

“A Tale of Two Secrets”: Examining the Diverging Effects of Secrecy on Consumption Enjoyment

Xiaojing Yang, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA
Xiaoyan Deng, Ohio State University, USA
Lei Jia, Ohio State University, USA

Read More

Featured

Effects of Brand Knowledge, Motivations, and Trust on Consumption Experience among Millennial Consumers

Ananya Rajagopal, Tecnológico de Monterrey, MEXICO

Read More

Featured

Turning “Expenses” into “Bills”: How spending Categorization Impacts Budget Optimism and Likelihood of Success

Eleanor Putnam-Farr, Rice University, USA
Anastasiya Pocheptsova Ghosh, University of Arizona, USA

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.