Effect of Thinking Style on Donation: Moderating Role of Cause Type

The research shows that donation causes differ in specificity, abstractness, and immediacy. Analytic thinkers are more willing to donate to humanitarian causes than to environmental causes, whereas holistic thinkers are equally willing to donate to both. The mechanism underlying such effects is the level of empathy aroused by different causes.



Citation:

Mehdi Hossain and Zhiyong Yang (2014) ,"Effect of Thinking Style on Donation: Moderating Role of Cause Type", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42, eds. June Cotte, Stacy Wood, and , Duluth, MN : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 512-513.

Authors

Mehdi Hossain, The University of Texas at Arlington
Zhiyong Yang, The University of Texas at Arlington



Volume

NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 42 | 2014



Share Proceeding

Featured papers

See More

Featured

Consumer Reluctance Toward Medical Artificial Intelligence: The Underlying Role of Uniqueness Neglect

Chiara Longoni, Boston University, USA
Andrea Bonezzi, New York University, USA
Carey K. Morewedge, Boston University, USA

Read More

Featured

K3. Goal or Knowledge? Exploring the Nature of Culture and its Consequential Effect

Xiaohua Zhao, Tsinghua University
Fang Wan, University of Manitoba, Canada
Antonios Stamatogiannakis, IE Business School, IE University
Haiyang Yang, Johns Hopkins University

Read More

Featured

Vicarious Pride: When Gift Customization Increases Recipients’ Appreciation of the Gift

Marta Pizzetti, Università della Svizzera Italiana
Michael Gibbert, Università della Svizzera Italiana

Read More

Engage with Us

Becoming an Association for Consumer Research member is simple. Membership in ACR is relatively inexpensive, but brings significant benefits to its members.